been more than 85 years since History Home and official Argentina maintains the conviction handed down by the victors against the time served and ruled the Brigadier General Don Juan Manuel de Rosas, under the grounds that his trial was finally substantiated and concluded.
For various reasons imposed later generations irrevisable obligation to consider that ruling. Besides the anger and passion put into play, it was clear that this approach of historical interpretation about Rosas could not undergo a revaluation process more equitable, in the very moment that the political ideology that this interpretation was used, beginning applicable in the country, was set on a constitution and entrenched in government.
More time elapsed and the fact that the right to review is denied more tenaciously than ever, has led us to wonder whether there is in that blindness is something more serious than just a utilitarian resource or simple political opportunism atavistic passion. And indeed, we noticed that the reason the ban was subordinating the need to avoid strenuous resistance and sacrifices that kept Rose from abroad, when he tried to subjugate our sovereignty, to offer too strong contrasts with some concepts that the generation of 53 was about Argentine heritage and registered in the register of the Constitution.
As the Association does not organize this we will study the Rosas era to illustrate doctrinal beliefs about forms of government, remain beyond our reach a comparison between the political ideals of that generation and the joint operation and practical solutions that Rose makes government a model of realism and political astuteness.
But instead, which by no means be silent patriotism, is that this comparison reveals a significant difference between Rosas and his adversaries, as to how to understand and defend national interests. All the government first, they always had the national will, is a single and more vigorous response to genuine national questions, the needs of the armed defense of their integrity and land, the longing of the Nation at the request of a sovereign state that coverage, and the interpreter, without detracting from their tradition and dignity. His enemies on the other hand, inspired by other political theses, failed to organize an independent state in the strict meaning of the term, leaving open gaps where infiltrated by alien forces and interests contrary to the integrity of their soil and to the enhancement and distribution of their wealth.
Front began to experience the fruits of which 53 notices our time, roses were presented again to the public conscience of Argentina as a target man frustrated by a conspiracy interest and anti-national forces. The patriotic duty to return to that destination, involves thorough consideration of the time were marked out its first and most brilliant directors.
He is mobile, it is the object of our Association.
* First Declaration of the Institute of Historical Research "Juan Manuel de Rosas", adopted by the Assembly General Partner the August 6, 1938.
FIRST EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF THE RESEARCH INSTITUTE "JUAN MANUEL DE ROSAS"
President: Gen. John B.
Ithurbide
Vice-President 1: Dr. Manuel Gálvez
Vice-President 2: Lt. COL. Evaristo Ramirez Juarez
Secretary General: Dr. Ramón Doll
Secretary of Section Publications: Dr. Ernesto Palacio
Library File ID: Mr. Julio Irazusta
Release and Conference ID: Mr. Roberto de Laferrere
Body ID: Dr. Ricardo Font Ezcurra
Members: Dr. Carlos Steffens Soler, Rodolfo Irazusta, Dr. Mario Lassaga Mr. ISIDORE GARCIA SANTILLAN, Mr. Alberto Ezcurra Medrano, Mr. ALBERTO CONTRERAS. Dr. ALFREDO VILLEGAS Oromia, and Dr. Luis M. PAUL BROWN.
Manuel Gálvez in his youth, was one of the founders of the Institute of Historical Research Juan Manuel de Rosas. 
0 comments:
Post a Comment