Monday, February 21, 2011

Free Blueprints For Octagon Table

THE OFFICIAL STORY, CLARÍN AND Plumíferos



By Jorge O. Sulé

When we thought the grotesque hallucinations off against Juan Manuel de Rosas, the result of heated political partisanship post Caseros, see emerging from the ashes of the official story some dying embers can no longer shed light on the generalities of a genuine and fair interpretation of the Argentina's history.

anachronistic These embers have been removed from their ashes in the newspaper "Clarín " in its edition of Sunday November 28, 2010 encouraged by the breath of such a denigrating Marcelo Moreno, the author signing.

We will refer to by "sinful" by the author rancher passing on to roses, nor do we refer to the "merciless massacred Indians also lavishes. On the extraction Rose sociological and directionality of their political and economic management and much has been written so the author of the note should be updated regarding relations with the Indians Rosas recommend you consult their own testimonies of the Indians of the time, although we know that the revisionist works were and are largely silenced or maligned before refuted rather than read. So let's stop at a pearl that the author believes he can find to denigrate step tries Rosas and politicking with trying a pathetic history parallels between Videla and Galtieri with Rosas.

is the trial that they were made to federal Reinafe-Governor of Cordoba and his brothers, Quiroga accused of killing occurred in Cordoba on 16 February 1835.

The historical context is: Dorrego and shooting of officers in Buenos Aires, killing the governor of Salta Latorre, murder of Quiroga in Cordoba, plots of the unit to return to power and so on., anarchy in sum. The Chamber of Representatives without hesitation and unanimously appointed governor of Buenos Aires Roses with Sum Public Power, the author ignores context. Rosas also omits to say that demanded the trial of criminals in Cordoba. Omits to say that José Vicente Reinafe, the governor, a day before the murder, he moved to Villa del Rosario preparing his alibi, delegating control in his Economy Minister Domingo Aguirre. Aguirre omits to say that an investigative committee appointed consisting of two employees of the government, one nephew Reinafe Francisco. Omits to say that the committee appointed gives off, and finally a game santiagueña accused. Omits to say that, again José Vicente, still stalling expressing "hope of people yawning over Quiroga late event which I think is in the papers " in a letter to his brother Francisco. There follows the months, the impression was that land was put and all would be forgotten. On 7 August the governor José Vicente happens Pedro Nolasco Rodríguez, José Antonio Reinafe father. It had been six months without a decision. Rose goes into a rage and demands the prosecution of those responsible. Finally, under pressure Roses, Rodriguez announced the arrest of the brothers Reinafe, leaving previously escaped.

Francisco escapes Montevideo, José Antonio Antofagasta, Guillermo is hiding in the mountains. The only people arrested are José Vicente, with the excuse of having representative government, and Santos Perez, the head of the murderous game.

Rodriguez, in a last attempt to save his family, provides for the establishment of a third indictment; further delay. Rosas, with Estanislao López consent requests straight to the provincial congress is elected governor Manuel López. After further delays by Derqui Santiago, chairman of the Cordoba conference is named Manuel Lopez, and it refers to prisoners who have been recaptured in Buenos Aires.

By Order of the provinces, which also fails to tell the hired hack, Buenos Aires through Rosas should try them. Rosas

delegated sentence summary and Manuel Vicente Maza, also fails to detail that the scribbler of yore. Santos Perez confesses followed directives from his superiors, Guillermo and José Vicente and José Antonio blame Francis fled to Montevideo. The defendants named its defenders. One of them presented a letter Marcelo Gamboa. It makes no substantive defense but an indictment of the lack of a written constitution. In his view, the Reinafe could not be tried by a delegation of provincial governors in Buenos Aires and asked to publish his defense. Rosas bother with harsh language "only a bold insolent rogue forensic ... etc. "has been under the guise of exercising a right of defense" a request to publish a letter political propaganda. " Rosas sentenced him to highlight " one by one the lines of its bold presentation "Not to go farther than twenty blocks from the Plaza of the Victoria , not to exercise his profession. " not charge the federal currency " if not fulfilled would be " paraded through the streets on a donkey sky." Gamboa is not known whether served the sentence to emphasize "the lines " ... or more than twenty blocks away, possibly accomplished by being a city whose urban area did not exceed fifteen blocks. But it was not accomplished to not practice their profession because that same year he signed professional writings, including the process followed Reinafe. All this ignores the shift thurifer. Gamboa was not prosecuted or walked in the blue donkey or suffered arrests or police visits in the difficult times of 1840 and 1843. Neither Home Gamboa after some complained about persecution in times of Roses. Maza pronounce finally advising the shooting of Santos Perez, left Reinafe and 17 of the 28 soldiers of the game. Rosas spent the sentencing advisory opinion asking Dr. Lahitte state who asked for confirmation. Proponents, including Gamboa who has been raised inhibition, they asked to commute the sentences. Rosas asked Maza and Lahitte reports that are pronounced by the court but enforcement is advised lowering of the soldiers.

The final decision of October 9, 1836, 17 convicted soldiers are reduced to 3. The 26 of this month, making the execution of murderers of Quiroga.

Mr. Moreno in his note on Clarín lightened things silenced facts and circumstances, contextualizes the story, he used rabbits and disqualified for repeated research and wanted to politick with history.

latter a writer who considers his job not to do and is definitely impossible when you do not know history or politics is played fairly.

0 comments:

Post a Comment